Speedendurance.com |
REVIEW: Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly vs. Adidas F50 Soccer cleats Posted: 12 Feb 2010 09:00 AM PST Here in Italy, we love our football or CALCIO. After attending a few games, I started to see some patterns. On the clothing side, a lot of spectators wear Italian made KAPPA. You can't miss their logo. But for footwear among the players, it's a toss up between the Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly versus the Adidas F50 Both are good shoes, or "boots", and it's all a matter of preference among brand names and loyalty. Last year's press release for the Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly can be found here. Here are some pros and cons between the boots. The price are comparable, so that should not be an issue, unless you find a huge discount or deals. If you do, please let me know! Nike Mercurial Vapor SuperflyNike Mercurial Vapor V FG – Mens – Max Orange/Abyss/Metallic Silver PROS: Endorsed by Ronaldo, Drogba, and Ibrahimovic Lightest shoe at 8.4 oz. 185 grams Molded stud configuration with molded blades (may be a CON for some people) CONS: Durability on older models were questionable after incidents of Luis Fabiano and Didier Drogba boots fell apart during a game. No lace cover, which cuts down on weight and supposedly helps with accuracy when striking the ball. In their own words:
Adidas F50adidas F50.9 TUNIT – Mens – Cardinal/White/Dust PROS: Detachable and interchangeable studs and cleats. Endorsed by Lionel Messi and David Villa CONS: slightly heavier at 10.8 oz. In their own words:
Tags: Shoes & Spikes, Soccer |
You are subscribed to email updates from SpeedEndurance.com To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment